Pixel 6

Any links to online stores should be assumed to be affiliates. The company or PR agency provides all or most review samples. They have no control over my content, and I provide my honest opinion.

The Google Pixel 6 started shipping this week, being the first phone to use the custom Google Tensor chipset. This is the biggest upgrade for the Pixel series in years, and many people are already claiming that the Pixel 6 Pro is the best Android phone of the year.

The Google Tensor uses some similar specs as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 and the Samsung Exynos 2100 and will certainly be a very powerful chipset that will handle the most demanding of tasks, but how good is it compared to the other flagship chipsets of this year?

I will preface these results stating that benchmarks are really not the best indication of real-word performance. Some brands optimise the phones to perform well in benchmarks, and benchmarks such as 3DMark Stress Testing will push the phone beyond what most normal users will ever do in real life. However, as inaccurate as they may be, they do provide some objective numbers which help guide my reviews rather than me trying to explain the performance of one phone from another clumsily.


Google TensorQualcomm Snapdragon 888Samsung Exynos 2100Mediatek Dimensity 1200
Fabrication Process5nm5nm5nm6nm
CPU2x Arm Cortex-X1 @ 2.80GHz
2x Arm Cortex-A76 @ 2.25GHz
4x Arm Cortex-A55 @ 1.80GHz
1x ARM Cortex-X1 @ 2.84 GHz
3x ARM Cortex-A78 @ 2.42 GHz
4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.8 GHz
1x Arm Cortex-X1 @ 2.9GHz
3x Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.8GHz
4x Arm Cortex A55 @ 2.2GHz
1 x Arm Cortex A78 @ 3.0Ghz
3 x Arm Cortex A78 @ 2.6Ghz
4 x Arm Cortex A55 @ 2Ghz
GPUArm Mali G78MP20Qualcomm Adreno 660Arm Mali G78MP14Arm Mali G77 MC9
AI/NPUTensor Processing UnitHexagon 780 DSPTriple NPU + DSPAPU 3.0

Google has gone a bit left field with the design decisions for the Tensor. It is the only chipset to run two of the new high powered Arm Cortex-X1 CPU cores but then pairs them up with somewhat outdated Arm Cortex-A76.

The GPU design is also a monster with 20 processing cores 42% more than the Samsung Exynos 2100.


Antutu ResultsChipsetTotalCPUGPUMemUX
Pixel 6Google Tensor652933168583250207103022131121
Red Magic 6s ProSnapdragon 888+870879224338327346146060173135
Red Magic 6RSnapdragon 888826600209106320101131967165417
Realme GTSnapdragon 888797855204680309021120085164069
OnePlus 9 ProSnapdragon 888782633194319306204130315151796
Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraExynoss 210063894117780126943010839183319
OnePlus Nord 2Dimensity 1200-AI535652136004191919101376106354

The Antutu results don’t look overly favourable when compared to the Qualcomm equipped phones. I have included three SD888 phones on the list to show the relatively large difference in performance, with some brands pushing the chipset a bit harder. The gaming-focused Red Magic phones have a significant performance emphasis over battery efficiency.


Geekbench 5ChipsetSingle CoreMulti Core
Honor Magic5 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 214814932
Honor Magic4 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 112203569
Xiaomi Mi 11Snapdragon 88811393693
OnePlus 9 ProSnapdragon 88811093487
Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraExynos 210010793381
Google Pixel 6Google Tensor10422957
XiaomiDimensity 8200-Ultra10053744
OPPO Find X5 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 19763484
Asus ROG Phone 3
Snapdragon 865+9753357
Realme GT Neo 3Dimensity 81009663672
OPPO Find X3 ProSnapdragon 8889283357
Realme X50 ProSnapdragon 8659103205
Infinix Note 30 VIPDimensity 80508543047
Redmi K30 UltraDimensity 1000+7822890
Samsung Galaxy S20Exynos 9907722590

I reused one of my old tables here. With this one, you can see how well the Tensor chipset performs against the Snapdragon 765G which was used on the Pixel 5. A 70% and 55% performance difference between the Pixel 6 and the Realme X50 with the SD765G.

In comparison to the other flagship chipsets, Geekbench results were somewhat predictable. The two Arm Cortex-X1 cores are clocked lower than the single Cortex-X1 on the Qualcomm and Snapdragon, giving them an advantage for the single-core.

Similarly, the inclusion of the A76 cores drops the overall multi-core performance. However, it is still a perfectly respectable result.

3DMark Wildlife – Stress Testing & Thermal Throttling

Pixel 6 3Dmark vs Samsung vs OnePlus
Pixel 6 vs OnePlus 9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
3DMarkChipsetWild Life HighWild Life LowStabilityTemperatureBattery
iQOO 12 RetestSnapdragon 8 Gen 3183461214466.2%26° to 42°87% to 73%
iQOO 12 First TestSnapdragon 8 Gen 318087754941.7%25° to 39°96% to 82%
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltraSnapdragon 8 Gen 317580982855.9%24° to 42°79% to 66%
Honor Magic5 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 212726856767.3%19° to 38°100% to 92%
Honor Magic4 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 110189644563.3%24° to 44°86% to 72%
OPPO Find X5 ProSnapdragon 8 Gen 19537606063.5%21° to 44°33% to 23%
Pixel 8 ProGoogle Tensor G38434559966.4%27° to 44°83% to 72%
Pixel 7 ProGoogle Tensor G26527476673%
Pixel 6Google Tensor6908348750.5%
Xiaomi 13TDimensity 8200-Ultra6485587990.728° to 42°83% to 74%
OnePlus 9 ProSnapdragon 8885775348960.3%
OPPO Find X3 ProSnapdragon 8885765380466%
Samsung Galaxy S21 UltraExynos 21005466640462.3%
Xiaomi Mi 11Snapdragon 8885550504590.9%
Realme GTSnapdragon 8885850323455.3%
Oppo Find X3 NeoSnapdragon 8655038494298.1%
Realme GT Neo 3Dimensity 81005446539999.1%32° to 38°100% to 94%
Infinix Note 30 VIPDimensity 80504565450698.731° to 46°100% to 91%
OnePlus Nord 2Dimensity 12004161293270.5%

The 3DMark Wild Life stress test is where things get quite interesting. The Google Tensor has both the best and worst performance of the year. With a high score of 6908, that is almost 20% ahead of the OnePlus 9 Pro with the SD888 and 26% ahead of the Samsung with the Exynos 2100.

However, it has the worst stability score of the year, with the final run being almost half of the high score. Looking at the graph, there is a sharp decline immediately, with the scores starting to stabilise out at around 9 minutes.

For the OnePlus 9 Pro loop graph, you have a fairly stable result for 6 minutes, a slight decline up to 18 minutes, then a steep decline for the last two. So, this may be a bit lower overall, but the sustained performance is better.

The Pixel 6 is obviously amazing for very short bursts, being significantly more powerful than competing brands. However, that sharp decline will likely be something that affects real-world performance in things like gaming. How much you will notice this, is another question. The phone still has plenty of power even when fully throttled.

One thing that is worth noting, the Pixel 6 peaks at 39-degrees and loses about 8% of battery during the test. Other phones run both hotter and have higher battery drain. For example, the OnePlus 9 Pro hit 41-degrees, but the Red Magic 6R (which had almost no throttling) hit 59-degrees and dropped 18%.

Pixel 6 3Dmark Wildlife Stress Test
Pixel 6 Stress Testing

PCMark 3.0 Work and Battery Testing

PCMark results vary wildly between brands, even if two different phones use the same chipset. It’s a good indication of both the inaccuracies of benchmarks but you could argue it is a sign of how having a certain chipset doesn’t guarantee a specific level of performance.

An example of this would be the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G which achieved 9195 with the Realme GT Master but 12177 with the Honor 50.

For the Pixel, with a score of 10598, the Tensor achieves an admirable result while keeping the CPU clocks quite low when you look at the graph.

AI Benchmark

Ai Benchmarks
Ai Benchmark Comparison

One of the Pixel 6 series selling points and the Google Tensor is its AI processing ability.

The Ai-Benchmark.com app has in the past had some questionable results and is another good example of the issues faced when using benchmarking apps.

 It significantly favours the FP16 results. In the past this has meant that Huawei/HiSilicon Kirin chipsets have dominated the results, even though the Snapdragon chipset performs better with the INT8 scores.

The Google Tensor has some along and dominated this benchmark. Largely thanks to the absolutely massive FP16 results. However, they also score highly on the IN8 scores, not a high as the SD888 but not far off, and significantly higher than the Kirin 9000.


The Google Tensor performs about as well as I had expected. It doesn’t offer quite the same level of raw power as the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, but I don’t think Google was ever positioning it as the most powerful chipset.

The thermal throttling issues were somewhat predictable, it happened on the SD888 and the Exynos 2100. It seems that the Cortex-X1 and/or Samsung 5nm fabrication process isn’t very good for efficiency. If or how much this affects real-world performance is another question. I suspect not much.

Google massively increased the battery sizes this year, but due to the power of the Tensor chipset, I suspect that the overall performance won’t be quite as good as I would have liked. Early benchmarks for this look OK, but I need more time with it to see how I feel about real-world performance.

Overall, it is an impressive start for Google’s custom chipset, but there is obviously a lot of room for improvement.

Last update on 2024-06-15 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *